Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Understanding winding up petitions: the process and common pitfalls
    2024-01-29

    Following our article on statutory demands (“SD”), if a company has received a SD and has failed to raise a legitimate dispute or make payment, then the creditor can proceed with a winding up petition. Winding up petitions play a crucial role in the legal landscape, particularly in the context of debt recovery and business insolvency.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Keystone Law, Statutory demand, Insolvency
    Authors:
    Matthew Hennessy-Gibbs , Ben Crowley
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Keystone Law
    Statutory demands: understanding their significance in business
    2024-01-10

    A statutory demand (“SD”) is a formal written request for payment of a debt, typically issued by a creditor to a debtor. This legal document serves as a precursor to more severe actions, such as winding up proceedings or bankruptcy. Understanding the key aspects of a SD is crucial for both creditors seeking repayment and debtors facing potential legal consequences.

    1. Purpose and legal basis

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Keystone Law, Statutory demand
    Authors:
    Matthew Hennessy-Gibbs , Ben Crowley
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Keystone Law
    Potential pitfalls in drafting statutory demands
    2022-02-25

    This week’s TGIF considers Re C88 Project Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 126, a New South Wales Supreme Court case which provides guidance on the effect of omitting prescribed information, and including claims for disputed judgment interest, on the validity a statutory demand.

    Key Takeaways

    Filed under:
    Australia, New South Wales, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Corrs Chambers Westgarth, Statutory demand, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia), New South Wales Supreme Court
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Corrs Chambers Westgarth
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days